There has been some debate over whether shelters help solve the problem of domestic violence. After some searching, I came across the Volunteers of Ameria, Oregon (VOAOR) branch. Their Home Free program provides “long-term post-crisis support” to prevent victims from going back to an abusive household. They had an innovative approach to the problem of barriers to accessing support — they made their services mobile.
What caught my attention was a powerpoint presentation listed on the National Alliance to End Homelessness (NAEH) website. The NAEH’s goal is pretty self-explanatory. The VOAOR Home Free’s presentation at the 2006 NAEH conference had the following main points:
- Home Free’s new model is not a miracle solution
- The mobility of advocates dramatically increased the number of abuse victims they could serve
- Motel vouchers worked in addition to or instead of “shelters”
- “The cost of 2 shelter nights for a family of four is equivalent to a month’s rent for the same family.”
- Closing their shelter and expanding “housing-focused services”, motel vouchers and “mobile advocacy” improved response to “under-served needs of survivors”
- They have increased the number of housing options for survivors turned away from shelters
- This new model takes away economic barriers that lead victims back to their abusers
Their challenges are here, as seen on the original slide:
I think it is very interesting that they have closed their shelter and found that alternative housing options worked better for their clients. Their statements that communities understand the concept of shelters and that staff were skeptical seem to have foretold the debates in the comments section in my earlier post, Kids and Domestic/Relationship Violence.
I think we are so used to the ideas of shelters (and transition homes) that we have not really looked at other housing options that would separate abuse survivors and their abusers. Closing their shelter and increasing their other services were very brave moves for VOAOR.





